United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer has dismissed Peter Mandelson from his position as ambassador to the United States following fresh revelations about his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The decision came after the Foreign Office reviewed newly uncovered emails that revealed the depth of Mandelson’s connection with Epstein.
Emails Reveal Closer Relationship
The leaked correspondence showed that Mandelson’s ties to Epstein were much stronger than previously believed.
In 2008, while Epstein was facing investigation in the US for sexual offenses, Mandelson sent him supportive messages urging him to “fight for early release” and adding, “I think the world of you.”
Epstein was later sentenced to 18 months in prison for procuring a minor for prostitution.
Key Revelations
- Supportive letters: Mandelson once referred to Epstein as his “best pal” in a 2003 letter.
- Admission of poor judgment: He later admitted he had been misled by Epstein’s false claims of innocence.
- Political backlash: Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch and several Labour MPs demanded Mandelson’s immediate removal.
Mandelson’s Controversial Background
Nicknamed the “Prince of Darkness” for his media skills and political maneuvering, Mandelson was a key figure in Tony Blair’s Labour government.
However, his career has been dogged by controversy, including two resignations over misconduct allegations in the 1990s and 2000s.
Despite his troubled past, Mandelson was appointed ambassador to Washington in early 2025 to strengthen UK-US ties under President Donald Trump.
Pressure Mounts on Starmer
Just one day before the sacking, Starmer had defended Mandelson’s appointment, saying due process had been followed. But mounting political pressure and strong reactions from victims’ groups forced a swift change of course.
The dismissal comes only days before President Trump’s planned state visit to the UK, highlighting the sensitivity of the issue at a time of intense diplomatic activity.
Why It Matters
Mandelson’s removal underscores how past associations can resurface and undermine high-profile political appointments.
It also shows Starmer’s willingness to act quickly under public and political pressure, as he navigates both domestic scrutiny and key international relationships.