The U.S.-China trade negotiations have reached an impasse, according to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
Bessent revealed in an interview that the talks are “a bit stalled,” emphasizing the need for direct intervention by President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to resolve complex issues, including intellectual property protections and the fentanyl trade.
With a 90-day tariff pause agreed upon in Geneva on May 12, 2025, set to expire in mid-August, the stakes are high for both nations to secure favorable terms in this ongoing trade war.
A High-Stakes Standoff
Bessent likened the negotiations to “three-dimensional chess,” highlighting the complexity of unresolved issues that demand leader-level discussions.
The temporary tariff rollback—U.S. rates reduced from 145% to 30% and China’s from 125% to 10%—provides breathing room, but progress remains sluggish.
A federal appeals court’s decision on May 29, 2025, to reinstate tariffs after a trade court’s challenge adds further uncertainty, potentially escalating tensions if Trump and Xi fail to engage.
Defending Executive Trade Powers
Bessent underscored the administration’s commitment to a mercantile trade agenda prioritizing American interests.
He dismissed concerns about judicial overreach, arguing that courts lack authority to challenge Trump’s tariff powers when the Senate has not intervened.
This defense of executive action aligns with a strategy to boost tariff revenue and protect U.S. industries, even as negotiations falter.
Bessent’s remarks signal a calculated approach: apply tariff pressure, secure temporary pauses, and push for high-level talks to break deadlocks.
Broader Trade Strategy and Optimism
Conversely, Bessent expressed confidence in trade talks with other partners, such as Japan, noting that some agreements are nearing completion.
He cited the European Union’s swift response to Trump’s 50% tariff threat as proof of effective pressure tactics, suggesting a broader strategy of leveraging tariffs to extract concessions.
Despite the stalled China talks, Bessent remains optimistic, pointing to a 2020 trade framework as a foundation for progress. He also highlighted an “upside surprise” in China’s cooperation on curbing fentanyl precursor drugs, a rare area of advancement.
Implications for Global Trade
The stalled negotiations pose risks for American businesses, which face prolonged uncertainty if talks collapse.
However, Bessent’s strategy promises stronger trade terms if successful, potentially reshaping U.S.-China economic relations.
With the 90-day pause nearing its end, the prospect of a Trump-Xi dialogue could be pivotal for global trade dynamics, as the outcome will influence markets, industries, and international relations, as both nations navigate this critical juncture.